Great, thanks for the clarification on the packages below, as well as the webkit2gtk3 package names.
> Peter Robinson <mailto:pbrobin...@gmail.com> > May 12, 2020 at 2:27 PM >> Here's a curated list of packages that are/may be relevant to us/SoaS: >> >> rpms/sugar-analyze is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users >> rpms/sugar-analyze is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': >> pbrobinson, tuxbrewr, callkalpa > This was retired in f-29, I don't remember why, it'll need to under go > a new review process > >> rpms/sugar-help is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users >> rpms/sugar-help is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': pbrobinson, >> callkalpa > This was retired in f-26, I don't remember why, it'll need to under go > a new review process > >> rpms/sugar-presence-service is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': >> pbrobinson, tomeu > This was retired because it was removed as a requirement in sugar > years ago, I had asked they eToys upstream maintainers for over 3 > years to port it to the newer sugar APIs and hence eToys was retired, > there's no reason to have sugar-presence-service > >> rpms/webkitgtk is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users >> rpms/webkitgtk is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': pwalter, >> kevin, tpopela, huzaifas, mso >> rpms/webkitgtk3 is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users >> rpms/webkitgtk3 is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': phatina, >> mclasen, pwalter, tpopela 'groups': @gnome-sig >> rpms/webkitgtk4 is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users >> rpms/webkitgtk4 is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': tpopela, >> kalev, catanzaro 'groups': @gnome-sig > These have moved around and are provided by various packages, I > believe sugar only requires the last one and it's provided by > webkit2gtk3 so there's no issue here that I can see. > _______________________________________________ > SoaS mailing list > SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas > Alex Perez <mailto:ape...@alexperez.com> > May 12, 2020 at 10:13 AM > FYI. See below e-mail. There may be others in the list that I'm > unaware of. Ibiam, we should probably get you set up as a maintainer > for the sugar packages listed below: > > Here's a curated list of packages that are/may be relevant to us/SoaS: > > rpms/sugar-analyze is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users > rpms/sugar-analyze is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': > pbrobinson, tuxbrewr, callkalpa > rpms/sugar-help is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users > rpms/sugar-help is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': > pbrobinson, callkalpa > rpms/sugar-presence-service is retired and has the following: > 'maintainers': pbrobinson, tomeu > rpms/webkitgtk is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users > rpms/webkitgtk is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': > pwalter, kevin, tpopela, huzaifas, mso > rpms/webkitgtk3 is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users > rpms/webkitgtk3 is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': > phatina, mclasen, pwalter, tpopela 'groups': @gnome-sig > rpms/webkitgtk4 is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users > rpms/webkitgtk4 is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': > tpopela, kalev, catanzaro 'groups': @gnome-sig > > > >> *From:* Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> >> *Date:* May 11, 2020 at 11:49 PM >> *To:* devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> *Subject:* Retired packages with maintainers >> Good Morning Everyone, >> >> A little while ago we have received the request on the infra issue >> tracker to >> remove all maintainers of retired packages [1]. >> >> So today I decided to look at what this would look like and wrote a >> script that >> queries PDC for the list of all branches on all projects [2], gather >> from it a >> list of all the packages that are retired on all their branches (so >> all branches >> are ``active=false``). >> For each of these retired project, it queries dist-git to find out if >> they still >> have maintainers in addition to the ``orphan`` user. >> >> The outcome of this script can be found there: >> >> https://pingou.fedorapeople.org/retired_packages_with_maintainers.log >> >> >> Some stats about this: >> - 881 RPM packages are retired and still have maintainers (out of >> 4322 retired >> RPMs). >> - 662 of them are not orphaned >> - 42 modules are retired and still have maintainers (out of 42 >> retired modules). >> - all of them are not orphaned >> - 2 containers are retired and still have maintainers (out of 3 retired >> containers). >> - all of them are not orphaned >> >> Which brings a couple of questions: >> - Do we have a documented way to mark modules as orphaned or retired? >> - Should we orphan all the RPM packages that are retired but not >> orphaned? >> >> >> Finally, does everyone agree about the original request: "remove all >> maintainers >> of retired packages"? Or should we bring this to FESCo? >> >> >> Thanks for your inputs, >> >> Pierre >> >> >> [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8600 >> [2] https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/extras/active_branches.json (8+Mb file) >> _______________________________________________ >> devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > SoaS mailing list > SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
_______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas