On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Sukhbir Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Eleanor, > > Thanks for sending your report. > >> In the first week, I did not do much but simply read some >> documentations and had a few sample tests. >> >> * Read Debian Policy >> * Read Debian New Maintainers' Guide >> * Worked on dpkg to make it recognize mips64el >> * Talked with my mentor a lot and had a few brain storm > > That's OK. > > If your discussions with your mentor are on a public mailing list, you > can reference it here so that others can follow the discussion if they > are interested. >
The discussions were mostly happen through Internet voice calling, which is easy to handle because my mentor and I live in the same timezone. I posted a question[1] on debian-mips mailing list, but I think I really need to try to improve my performance when participating technical discussion through such a form. [1]http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2013/06/msg00006.html >> Since this is the first week that everything just went started, there >> is not much to say, but I will get more work done next week. > > Can you please describe your plans for the next week? (A short summary > should suffice.) > I'll be working on a non-multilib enabled version of cross toolchain, which is basically these things: 1. dpkg support (patch done, to be submitted, already built for amd64) 2. binutilus (version sensitive so far, already built for amd64) 3. linux-libc-dev (built on amd64, it shows that linux-3.10-rc2 or higher is needed to have getdents64 in headers) 4. gcc-stage1 (doing on amd64) 5. eglibc-stage1 (TBD) 6. gcc-stage2 (TBD) 7. eglibc-stage2 (TBD) 8. gcc-stage3, which is the first final cross compiler (TBD) Thanks, Eleanor -- It is the time you have spent for your rose that makes your rose so important. _______________________________________________ Soc-coordination mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/soc-coordination
