I saw an explanation of this somewhere in the Netstumbler site or the Readme.
It's a known issue with Netsumbler. The Cisco ACU should be the more accurate reading. Frank -----Original Message----- On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have noticed a great difference between Netstubmler 0.4 and the Cisco ACU 6.2 in regards to the SNR and other elements. That is, when reading the Cisco SNR of say 20, 21 etc... I look at Netstumbler and get a reading of 34 SNR! First, which one can I trust to get reading that I can use, and Second, why the great difference.
