Hello,

Koen Deforche wrote:

[about number of rows affected]

> I think it has a great value when implementing an optimistic locking
> strategy (instead of using database locks), which uses a version or
> date stamp field to detect whether another thread has concurrently
> modified a particular record while doing a read-modify-write/delete
> cycle.

Could that be implemented (and encpasulated) with stored procedures?
Isn't the above scenario a bit too low-level?

[about Boost]

> Besides this, our library (Wt) already depends on boost, and in this
> way, we avoid having to add another dependency to our project.

If SOCI is included into Boost, then you *will* get another dependency 
in terms of bigger Boost library and more linker options that need to be 
used.
It might be easier for you to install all libraries, but since that is a 
one-time action I do not think it is a valid reason to merge libraries.

I think that SOCI would benefit more from efforts to make official 
packages for several target systems (rpm, deb, etc.).

Regards,

-- 
Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Soci-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users

Reply via email to