Christian Auby wrote: > I'll be happy to test with the set of compilers we use when there is > a release candiate. (MSVC, GCC MinGW, GCC Linux, GCC ARM)
Fantastico. I'll shout for help in 1-2 days. > Regarding build system, if inclusion in Boost is still a goal, will > there be a fully integrated boost.build setup? First of all, I have no knowledge SOCI has a goal to be included in Boost. AFAIR, it was discussed as a possibility. There is BoostCon'09 derived initiative called std::rdb. Quoting answer I gave at SO [1]: Regarding boost::sql proposal, there is some work in progress: # On BoostCon'09 Jeff Garland led workshop [3] Library in Week 2009 to discuss the std::rdb propsals, here are materials std::rdb (.tgz package) # std_rdb - Boost sister mailing list to discuss standard rdb proposal(s) [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/374147/what-is-boost-missing/2140589#2140589 [2] http://mail-lists.crystalclearsoftware.com/listinfo.cgi/std_rdb-crystalclearsoftware.com [3] http://www.boostcon.com/program/previous/2009 > I'm already building SOCI using Boost.Build on our local version. > Being able to both depend upon and compile SOCI by adding a > /SOCI//SOCI and /SOCI//SOCI_SQLite dependancy (for SOCI + SQLite) is > very powerful. I don't plan to maintain Boost Build support myself soon, but if you'd be willing to contribute it, I don't see any problem with including a bunch of Jamfiles. Especially Boost does support two build systems, BBv2 and CMake (unofficially). Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Soci-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users
