On 30 May 2013 13:24, Brian Ravnsgaard Riis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Den Thu, 30 May 2013 13:37:13 +0200 skrev Mateusz Loskot
> <[email protected]>:
>>
>> Brian,
>>
>> Thanks for reporting this.
>>
>> No, you are not missing anything, your use case looks fine.
>>
>> It seems there is a bug in SOCI caused by uninitialised indicator members
>> of conversion_into_type and conversion_use_type specialisations.
>>
>> I have opened issue:
>>
>> https://github.com/SOCI/soci/issues/152
>>
>> and I have proposed fix in this pull request
>>
>> https://github.com/SOCI/soci/pull/153
>>
>> It hasn't been merged, as it is to be decided if we want to
>> postpone release of this fix until SOCI 4.0.0.
>>
>> Meanwhile, if you could check if this fix solves your problem,
>> that would be very helpful. You can grab it from my fork of the repo
>> and checkout bugfix/152-indicators branch:
>>
>> git clone git://github.com/mloskot/soci.git
>> git checkout bugfix/152-indicators
>>
>> then build SOCI and test your program with it.
>>
>> Best regards,
>
> Yep, that seems to work nicely! Thanks a lot! :-)


Great, thanks!
I presume SOCI 3.2.2 is likely to be.

Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
_______________________________________________
soci-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users

Reply via email to