On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 08:23 -0400, Rob Myers wrote: > There are many important design decisions we can make regarding Social, > but at the moment it *is* going to be a federated server-based PHP/MySQL > system for the reasons that have been given. Issues like encryption and > accessibility are as important in this design as in any other but can we > please focus on how to quickly make something workable using this > architecture.
Is this your personal view, or the view of FooCorp? I understand that it was always Matt Lee's intention to do this a certain way, but I thought that this structural decision was up for debate (since there has been so much debate about it on this list). Was I mistaken, or did that change at some point?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
