2010/3/31 Carlo von Loesch <[email protected]> > Dear Social-discuss, don't look for László Török's original posting. > He sent it to me in private by mistake. I'll quote it in full. >
Thx and apologies. you should be seeing https://psyced.org/~lynX?lang=en but by mistake > it shows the fields in my language, not yours. Bug filed. > English is not my native language, can deal with German as well. ;) > structures in the entire decentralized network. I don't even want my > publicly accessible profile to be spidered and semanticized. I only > want my friends to have that level of data quality. > Actually, you can define different levels of access control to restrict access to sensitive content. There are quite a few ways to do that. One approach is http://esw.w3.org/WebAccessControl. There is no need to go and check out profiles. You already have > the entire social graph on your laptop and perform computations on > who might be able to help you with your maths homework or whatever. > And it's not just some outdated cache. By definition of the protocol > you always have the current graph with current phone numbers of your > friends and whatever else they put in there, available on your hard > disk to build amazing tools upon. > Again, it's your choice, there nothing that prevents you to make this data available in your local RDF store. > PSYC could just as well be adapted to additionally support RDF and SPARQL. > > Now, your are putting words in my mouth...:) > The embedded world could use semantically rich protocols that are > actually fast to parse and process, right? > > Sure, not willing to exclude them, but I would focus on desktop and server as a first shot as it is a easy win. Sometimes brilliant ideas have great success, no matter if the > implementation is good or bad. > I'd rather write sg. suboptimal that gains traction, but I might be wrong. Any thanks for the nice summary. I think it was valuable piece of material for everyone of us. L
