On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 19:00 -0500, Max Shinn wrote: > The other advantage to this is that services will start popping up all > over the place that use one's GNU Social identity. GNU Social, then, > would consist of three components: > 1. The core - the identity server, which manages the most basic functions, > and keeps track of other sites using its identity > 2. The framework - a set of libraries for various programming languages > that make it easy to develop apps that use GNU Social > 3. The vital applications - a few "official" applications for GNU Social, > such as a photo gallery, group server, etc. All of these would function > without the others, so individuals can choose whether or not they want to > use each component.
All of these fit into what I've been calling the "core" in my design of a GNU Social node - though (2) and (3) seem like different instances of the same "plugin"-type thing.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
