2010/5/26 Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson <[email protected]>

> Hello GNU-Social :-)
>
> I've been watching with keen interest the activity in the free/open-social
> space over the past few weeks, finally got around to subscribing to your
> list.  I've got an idea kicking around in my head (and a basic design),
> which might or might not be useful. Considering that I have considerably
> more ideas than I have time, I figured I'd try to start a discussion before
> spending much more time on it.
>
> Would it be useful for the various open-social projects if there were a
> cloud-based dynamic HTTP-front-end service?
>
> This would be similar to DynDns, except instead of pointing your DNS
> records at your current IP, which may be firewalled, it would create a
> tunnel from your machine to an in-the-cloud reverse HTTP proxy, so a locally
> running HTTPD on your machine can serve requests to the general internet.
> Combined with a dynamic DNS solution, this would allow you to run your
> social web-app (or whatever else) on your own hardware, no matter how many
> firewalls are in your way and no matter how much you move around.
>
> Behavior when you aren't online is a fun topic: it could be anything from a
> dropped request, to a 'Sorry, I'm not online now' page, to automatic
> failover to a mirror on a friend's machine.
>
> Doing this for clear-text HTTP is very possible, for HTTPS this is pretty
> hard to do without running out of IP-addresses.  So an 'open social' web
> using a system like this would sacrifice over-the-wire encryption and
> authentication, but instead gain total local control over your software
> stack (aside from the proxies, of course).
>

Welcome!

Yes, that sounds like it would be very useful.

Why would you run out of IP addresses?  I currently use
dyndns.org(proprietrly sadly) to redirect to my apache https, but
something using free
software would be awesome.


>
> I don't know if that is an appealing trade-off for anyone... but man I wish
> someone would fix SSL so it wasn't 1:1 with IP addresses.  Is anyone working
> on that?
>
> (The idea I am toying with is quite a bit more convoluted, where the
> HTTP-front-ends themselves are a dynamic p2p network and the network
> supports mirroring and fail-over for static content - but if the basic
> functionality isn't interesting then there is little point in me typing all
> day.)
>
> Thoughts?  Oh, also - does this already exist?  :-)
>

Dont know the area that well, but interested if anyone knows of something.

>
> --
> Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson
> [email protected]
> http://bre.klaki.net/
>
> Use http://bre.klaki.net/bre/contact.shtml to bypass my spam filters.
> .oOo.oOo.   PGP: 02764305, B7A3AB89   .oOo.oOo.
>

Reply via email to