This is a good question.

Personally, I would rather see a bunch of protocols and some solid
implementations, which is pretty much what you are talking about. But i am
not a deeply private person.

Others put privacy first, and compatibility and interoperability second.
This is also a very valid point of view.

In the end it becomes a trade-off where the developers will be forced to
choose between communication and privacy. Hopefully the choices will be
niche ones, but at this point it's a bit hard to tell.

I'm not sure toward which side GNU Social is leaning at them moment - I
think they are more privacy focused.  Either way, it is very worth
discussing, and both avenues are worth exploring technically as well - let
the users choose?

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Matija Šuklje <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hullo,
>
> I know this is in a way another buzzword, but I've been wondering lately
> about
> interoperability of diverse Free social networking systems.
>
> Use case:
>
> Alice is a user of an Appleseed instance;
> Andrew is a user of an Appleseed instance;
> Boris is a user of a BuddyPress instance;
> Charlie is a user of a Crabgrass instance;
> Diana is a user of a Diaspora instance;
> Darwin is a user of a Diaspora instance;
> Estefan is a user of an Elgg instace;
> Gérémie is a user of a GNU Social/DaisyChain instance.
>
> Can/will all these people communicate via their Free social networking
> instances with others?
>
> If we end up with a bunch of separate social networks and Alice can
> communicate only with Andrew; Diana with Darwin; and all the rest are just
> islands to themselves, we haven't solved anything really.
>
> To some extent if we succeed only with intra-system, but not inter-system
> interoperability, the situation wouldn't be much different then the status
> quo
> in the long run, where Romeo is from Facebook and Juliet from MySpace, so
> to
> speak.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Matija
> --
> gsm: +386 41 849 552
> www: http://matija.suklje.name
> xmpp: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson
[email protected]
http://bre.klaki.net/

Use http://bre.klaki.net/bre/contact.shtml to bypass my spam filters.
.oOo.oOo.   PGP: 02764305, B7A3AB89   .oOo.oOo.

Reply via email to