heyubob now changed the subject to a political one!
Namely: the almighty dollar talks, why the big SPAMMERS like other mass marketers get their way in D C, why the system has turned our elected representatives into whores, why our two-party system cannot work anymore, why this old man - me, has given up all hopes for my children
and grands, why - - - -
Samples:
Trace where phonecalls originated from,
but no tracing where VIRUSES originated from!
Opt out of unsolicited phone calls, but
not 800 subscribers (mass marketers) and
not political calls!
So to be real cynical about it all?
Is it the will of The Almighty or the almighty dollar?
Oh well - - -
Tork

heyubob wrote:

Great, one more clever person has discovered a way to charge for something they (isps like aol), could and should stop, on their own. It seem that it would be impossible to tell who is generating all of the spam, but someone has to cover the initial bottom-line (who paid the bill?). If the N.S.A. can find out who's looking at porn, ya think a few spammers could be found, and at least slowed down. You should not have to pay (even more) for people and or companies to do the right thing.

kipster wrote:

this was reported on slashdot, too.

one could easily miss this news as it appears to be that old internet hoax about email postage. well, a little checking around shows its not a hoax, and April 1 is a couple months away.

so instead of just having the choice of either being inundated with spam or never receiving an email addressed to 3 or more recipients, you can pay to have 'superior spam filters'. i dont think AOL will handle this gracefully...their solutions always scare me!

i can imagine the debate here on spam.

kip


----- Original Message ----- From: "Rod Engelsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 10:03 AM
Subject: [social] E-mail postage debate


Remember that debate (argument... fight... whatever) that transpired on discuss some time back about spam? Well, it turns out that AOL and Yahoo are planning to implement a kind of premium email service:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/05/technology/05AOL.html?pagewanted=1&th&emc=th

--

Rod



Reply via email to