Seth Fitzsimmons wrote:
> Hey.
> 
> Is this the right list for comments on this XEP?
> 
> For example, Section 10.1 refers to the wrong namespace and Example 7
> contains some extraneous ''s.  I'm also confused by the presence of a
> (mandatory) timestamp in Example 2.  If it's indeed a geocoder (which
> that section mostly seems to describe), there's no relevant timestamp to
> return.

Timestamp-ing location queries help with averaging out errors over time.
Timestamp-ing is particularly useful for phones that only return the
primary cell-tower they are connected to rather than all the towers they
can "see".

Helge (cc'd) will check out the extraneous '' stuff. Thanks for the
heads-up.

> This is quite interesting though.  When Blaine and I built out Fire
> Eagle's PubSub service, we intentionally decided not to use XEP-0080, as
> we considered it lossy and not the best fit for this application.  I'll
> revisit that and try to remember specifically why that was the case; my
> initial reaction is that multiple levels of precision didn't fit and
> there was no room for additional elements like WOEIDs (although I
> suppose that could fit in the URI field).

Keen to hear more on why XEP-0080 didn't work for you. At the moment we
do a best-effort of populating the entire place stack when a user's
location changes. At very least a lat & long with an accuracy element.

We think that this would be useful later for things like a weather bot
that the user can subscribe to: bot subs a users location then pushes
weather info as the user moves around the country/world.

> Does anyone have client or server implementations of this yet (or intend
> to)? If so, we should talk.

We have been fine tuning the Buddycloud Location Butler (server
component) for over a year now.

Client implementations are out for Symbian S60 with iPhone and Android
clients in the works.

S.
-- 
Simon Tennant
Buddycloud
uk: +44 20 7043 6756               de: +49 89 420 955 854
uk: +44 78 5335 6047               de: +49 17 8545 0880
email and xmpp: [email protected]

Reply via email to