[SOCIAL CREDIT] Social Credit

[vince_ferrer]

Since the birth of the industrial age labour has progressively become a 
diminishing factor in the productive process. It has been referred to as a 
mere catalyst. Our material necessities could be adequately provided for 
with an increasingly small portion of the total population engaged in the 
workforce.  However, the system dictates that one must become a cog of the 
industrial process before one can have an income. But, the income the system 
distributes cannot buy the total goods that are available. The system again 
dictates that we must make more (even though we have enough) in order to 
consume what has already been made. What a crazy mess we’re all in!

I would like to hear a Social Credit response to my comments above. Why is 
there an anomaly in the system? On the one hand man-power has been displaced 
by solar-power and yet if you don’t work you don’t eat. On the other hand if 
we all work we can’t buy what has been produced except by working even more. 
How have we ended up in such a situation?

Please note I only want to hear from a Social Credit perspective as this is 
a Social Credit discussion list it’s what we’re supposed to be discussing!!





_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to  
http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84IaC.bcVIgP.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^================================================================