On 10 Mar 2003 at 18:29, Victor Bridger wrote: Dear Sir,
Attempting to put religious notes into Social Credit philosophy could be properly called with words you used. Especially in the current historical moment, where praising one religious stupidity exuses violence toward another one. There is no doubt that one's belief usually makes no obstacle in understanding and accepting Social Credit, neither national or other social identity, thus there is no need to emphasize its compatibility with any religion. Doing it, even accidentaly, makes named identity exclusive and "the right one". > It is a pity that some people cannot spell out correctly without attempting > to confuse. Why not spell out what victor Bridger wrote. Nonsense rubbish > such as written by anonymous deserves no other comment. > Vic Brudger > "Which is your perception of Christian principles. I can claim they are also > muslim principles, but also > principles of people having blue eyes. > > ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84IaC.bcVIgP.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html ==^================================================================
