Anant Gole wrote:
> TI HECC (High End CAN Controller) module is found on many TI devices. It
> has 32 hardware mailboxes with full implementation of CAN protocol 2.0B
> with bus speeds up to 1Mbps. Specifications of the module are available
> on TI web <http://www.ti.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Anant Gole <[email protected]>
I already reviewed this driver on the Socketcan-core ML and it's almost
OK from the Socket-CAN point of view. Just one issue...
[snip]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c b/drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9090103
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c
[snip]
> +static int ti_hecc_set_btc(struct ti_hecc_priv *priv)
> +{
> + struct can_bittiming *bit_timing = &priv->can.bittiming;
> + u32 can_btc;
> +
> + can_btc = (bit_timing->phase_seg2 - 1) & 0x7;
> + can_btc |= ((bit_timing->phase_seg1 + bit_timing->prop_seg - 1)
> + & 0xF) << 3;
> + if (bit_timing->brp > 4 && priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_3_SAMPLES)
> + can_btc |= HECC_CANBTC_SAM;
> + else
> + dev_info(priv->ndev->dev.parent,
> + "WARN: Triple sampling not set due to h/w limitations"
> + " at %d bitrate", bit_timing->bitrate);
That's not correct from my point of view. The warning message should
only be printed when the user tries to set triple sampling. I think it
should be similar to:
if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_3_SAMPLES) {
if (bit_timing->brp > 4)
can_btc |= HECC_CANBTC_SAM;
else
dev_warn(priv->ndev->dev.parent,
"Triple sampling not set due to h/w "
limitations");
}
Apart from that, the patch looks OK.
Wolfgang.
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
