Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:56:32AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Kurt Van Dijck wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:04:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>>> This patch makes the private functions alloc_can_skb() and >>>> alloc_can_err_skb() of the at91_can driver public and adapts all >>>> drivers to use these. While making the patch I realized, that >>>> the skb's are *not* setup consistently. The skb's are now setup >>>> as shown: >>> [...] >>>> Please check and comment. >>>> >>> Wolfgang, I think you forgot 1 out of 2 replacements within >>> the sja1000 core. >>> The result I got is a 'skb_over_panic' in the call this skb_put. >> Oops, thank for pointing that out. Applied to and fixed on SVN trunk. >> >>> I lost the emails on netdev mailing list to reply on >> It would be nice if you could post a corresponding patch to the netdev >> mailing list as well. > small question. which is the git repository that I'll base the patch on? > I'm not yet so familiar with it :-).
It's David Miller's net-next-2.6 tree. I that case don't mind, I will take care. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
