> > This is not possible yet. For that, I wanted to wait until the > > clock-representation in the device-tree (the patches you mentioned, I > > suppose) > > stabilizes. If this matures, we can add the proper way to do it. For now, > > "clock-ipb" is supported, the rest has to be done by the bootloader or > > additional patches. I wouldn't like to introduce "intermediate" properties > > to > > the device tree. > > Why "intermediate"? I think the clock should be selectable via device tree.
Sure. With "intermediate" I just meant we would define some properties now and we already know they will then be obsoleted by the OF-clock-implementation. Hmmmm... > For the MPC512x it's simple. For the MPC5200 it might be more tricky, > indeed. Anyhow, it's a requirement for mainline inclusion. Okay, will think about it. I am not so much afraid about the implementation, but thorough testing. Are there some people on this list interested in testing mscan with their test scenarios? Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
