Ira W. Snyder wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:36:25AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Hi Ira, >> >> Ira W. Snyder wrote: >>> Hello SocketCAN folks, >>> >>> Is there any feedback on this patch? I've waited two weeks without a >>> response to any part of the series. As this is the biggest patch in the >>> series, if you're fine with it, I think the other supporting patches >>> should be fairly uncontroversial. >> For some strange reason this patch did not show up in my socketcan mbox, >> sorry. At least I cannot find it. Oliver, or somebody else, did you >> receive it? Nevertheless, for kernel inclusion the patch should go >> through the netdev mailing list as described in: >> >> http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/socketcan/trunk/README.submitting-patches >> >> It's also confusing that one 2/3 shows up on the Socketcan-core ML. At >> least 0/3 should also be presented there. >> >> Could you please resubmit? >> > > Sure, I'll resubmit. > > The patch showed up just fine on socketcan-core for me (I'm subscribed).
It seems to be a local problem then :-). > It also showed up on LKML (I'm not subscribed). I'll make sure to CC I'm not subscribed either. > everyone with patch 0/3, as well as CC'ing netdev. Thanks, Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
