Bhupesh SHARMA wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, >> Right. I also found that link. So the Spear's CAN I/F seems to be based >> on the C_CAN. This brings me to the next question: why is the ccan >> driver parked in the "old" tree in SVN? Only because it's unmaintained? >> > We plan to send our C_CAN driver for review and addition to socketCAN > repository (and hopefully later in the mainline). Initial design inputs were > based on the Hynix C_CAN driver available in socketCAN distro. However, to > make things compatible to a structure used by newer drivers like SJA1000, we > had to change a lot of the design. Could you please let us know how to > proceed further on getting ST's C_CAN driver in the socketCAN distro?
See http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/socketcan/trunk/README.submitting-patches > As we are currently adding the basic architecture files for SPEAr in linux > mainline and still fixing some nasty bugs for our C_CAN driver, so it may > take a few weeks before we start submitting the patches for review. Ok. Thanks, Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
