Hi Alexander, On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Alexander Holler <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 24.07.2010 19:47, schrieb Fawad Lateef: > >> Recently I spent long-time in rewriting and testing rx and tx processing >> for >> mcp251x driver (especifically for AT91 and MCP2515) which now use >> Asynchronous mode in normal conditions which is fast and if there is some >> MERRF error then it switches to slow path which is Synchronous and later >> switch back fast/Async path when error condition is removed. Moreover it >> does bus recovery through restart-ms if BUS goes offline and this >> continues >> till BUS becomes online. There isn't any sort of hanging in any case. > > Reads like something I could have a use for. ;)
Good :) > >> At the moment that driver code is very ugly thats why I haven't posted it >> on >> mailing-list yet. On monday I can post it if someone want to test it >> (kindly >> let me know); although I will post cleaned-up patch some time later. > > Thanks for the offer. I would like to see and test it and I don't care much > about that "ugly", whatever it means. I promise to not throw stupid > comments about style (which I almost never do) ;) > By saying "ugly" I mean it might contain some unused code or some duplicated #defines with different names and some FIXME which likely don't need any fixing :) I will be posting that driver as it is (no patch for the time-being) in a separate mail today and will add you in the CC too. Hoping to get test results from you soon. > Regards, > > Alexander > Regards, Fawad Lateef _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
