Hi dtran11,

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:29 PM, dtran11 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi is there a patch for 2.6.34 version available?

I am afraid not. I tested it with 2.6.28 although socket-can including
this mcp251x driver is from latest svn repository of socket-can.

Regards,

Fawad Lateef

>
> Fawad Lateef wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just wanted to do a follow-up on async mcp251x driver which I posted
>> sometime ago: beside "Gianluca" is anyone else tested/checked that
>> driver ? Any feedback ?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -- Fawad Lateef
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Fawad Lateef <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:05 PM, gianluca
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hello list!
>>>>
>>>> Just to let to everyone know the spi_async() driver for mcp2515 written
>>>> by
>>>> Fawad Lateef works good.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for testing and posting results on list. Just wanted to _clear_
>>> that I _rewrote_ tx/rx path to use spi_async while switching to old
>>> synchronous functionality if some error occurs then switch back to
>>> asynchronous when error is handled. So its _not_ completely written by
>>> me :)
>>>
>>>> Fawad Lateef wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Good, Really nice to hear this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you do me a favour ? and Post your reply again while replying to
>>>>> ALL, so that others on mailing-list can see the results too ?
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Fawad Lateef
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:48 PM, gianluca
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fawad Lateef wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am sending mcp251x.c file to you directly. Please find it attached.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hoping to get feedback and test results soon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure! as soon as the driver is compiled, I will try with my torture
>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>> just to see how is going on!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, here the results:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It works! Our busload is one canpacket every 2-3 msec, with the Qt
>>>>>> Embedded
>>>>>> application running sometime at 30/40% of CPU Load (Samsung S3C2442
>>>>>> running
>>>>>> at 300Mhz).
>>>>>> Our torture test is on receiving: our S3C board sends a start command
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> special node on the bus, and this node starts to send a packet with ID
>>>>>>  counting up (from 0x00 to 0x7ff) and with a payload (32bit-4 bytes)
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> progressive number (counter).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Our application after sending the start command, it waits (recv()) the
>>>>>> packets incoming. Every received-packet it checks the previous
>>>>>> payload,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> if it is match the correct counter, dump all data on the screen
>>>>>> (serial
>>>>>> console running at 115.2K).
>>>>>> If some packet is missing (due to ID behaviour priority and/or packet
>>>>>> lost
>>>>>> due to speed of the isr interrupt) it prints a special line on the
>>>>>> screen.
>>>>>> At the end of transfer it will check the rx_over_errors.
>>>>>> If it is ZERO it displays a smile on the screen, otherwise it display
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> sort
>>>>>> of BAD sign...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now everything is working as expected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you very much.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ciao
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>          ,,,
>>>>>>         (o o)
>>>>>> ======oOO==(_)==OOo======
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gianluca Renzi
>>>>>> R&D
>>>>>> phone: +39.0542.609120
>>>>>> fax:   +39.0542.609212
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     .oooO  Oooo.
>>>>>> ======(   )==(   )=======
>>>>>>      \ (    ) /
>>>>>>       \_)  (_/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Fawad Lateef
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Socketcan-core mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://old.nabble.com/-RFC---PATCH--MCP251x-driver-using-Async-SPI-Interface-tp29267338p29492401.html
> Sent from the Socket-CAN Core mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Socketcan-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
>
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core

Reply via email to