On 09/23/2010 03:35 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > @Vladislav: Did you think about implementing some of your CANopen > functionality inside the Kernel? Especially for getting your specific > information about CAN frames and to ensure high-res timer handling, as done in > bcm.c or isotp.c ?!?
*sound of mkl polishing his crystal ball* I suppose that ixxat's IP lies in the canopen stack and implementing (parts) of it inside the kernel means IMHO that it falls under the GPL. And ixxat's stack probably runs on many different platforms so in their world socketcan is just another driver in their stack. cheers, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
