From: Wolfgang Grandegger <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:53:58 +0100
> On 12/16/2010 01:09 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote: >> On Thursday, December 16, 2010 6:11 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> >>> Ah, oh, I just realized that the register layout is almost identical to >>> the recently accepted *pch_can* driver. Tomoya, does pch_can use a c_can >>> core? Well, then it makes really sense to have a generic c_can driver >>> for the SPEAR, PCH, etc. Board specific details are handled via platform >>> definition. This driver already provides that functionality, IFAICS. >> >> Hi Wolfgang, >> >> It seems pch_can similar to c_can. >> However, sorry, I don't know if pch_can core is the same as c_can since >> LSI is provided by Intel. >> If necessary, please contact to Intel. > > You could also try to use that driver. I'm rather sure that it does work > on your hardware as well. Indeed. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
