Hello, On 12/20/2010 10:26 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > priv->tx_enable[] has PCH_TX_OBJ_END elements so this code is > reading and writing one past the end of the array. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c > index 8d45fdd..b2c1292 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c > +++ b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c > @@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ static int pch_can_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, > pm_message_t state) > pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_DISABLE); > > /* Save Tx buffer enable state */ > - for (i = PCH_TX_OBJ_START; i <= PCH_TX_OBJ_END; i++) > + for (i = PCH_TX_OBJ_START; i < PCH_TX_OBJ_END; i++) > priv->tx_enable[i] = pch_can_get_rxtx_ir(priv, i, PCH_TX_IFREG); > > /* Disable all Transmit buffers */ > @@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ static int pch_can_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev) > pch_can_set_optmode(priv); > > /* Enabling the transmit buffer. */ > - for (i = PCH_TX_OBJ_START; i <= PCH_TX_OBJ_END; i++) > + for (i = PCH_TX_OBJ_START; i < PCH_TX_OBJ_END; i++) > pch_can_set_rxtx(priv, i, priv->tx_enable[i], PCH_TX_IFREG); > > /* Configuring the receive buffer and enabling them. */ >
This fix does not look correct too me. There are much more loop using "i <= PCH_TX_OBJ_END" and the message numbering is from 1..32. Therefore using "priv->tx_enable[i - 1]" seems more appropriate to me. Tomaya, could you please check. Thanks, Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
