On 11.01.2011 05:13, Bhupesh SHARMA wrote: >> From: Wolfgang Grandegger [mailto:[email protected]] >> On 01/09/2011 12:01 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>>> BTW. for the next submission of Bhupeshs patchset, i would propose to >> name the >>> driver 'ccan' instead of 'c_can', so that we have a >>> >>> linux/drivers/net/can/ccan/... >>> >>> path. >> >> You are late ;-). Bosch named the controller *C_CAN* and therefore I >> asked Bhupesh some time ago to change the file name and variable name >> prefix from ccan to c_can. > > Actually V1 of this patchset used the naming convention ccan. > But as was rightly pointed out by Wolfgang and Mark, Bosch > has officially named this core as C_CAN and the naming convention > is kept as C_CAN throughout their user-manual and technical articles. > IMHO, `c_can` seems to represent this Bosch core in a better way > than ccan. Looks like there are really good reasons for the c_can naming :-) Thanks for explanation & also sorry for the noise! Best regards, Oliver _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
