On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:07:11PM +0100, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > ps. generally adding some new infrastructure to the networking stuff without > the 'user' for this infrastructure is a no-go. There had been several rejects > from Dave when people tried to integrate support for hidden out-of-tree > sources. What about contributing your current j1939 source and discussing this > here on the ML and make first steps on the SVN? Out-of-tree developments are > hard to maintain ... and surely j1939 is a non-differentiating protocol - > therefore i also added my ISO 15765-2 implementation to get a better feedback > from the community on my work.
well, I resumed work on j1939 this year. Our intention is to start contribution in the next several weeks. I felt that it was better to contribute a working prototype to discuss about, than having a non-functional piece of code. With the addition of netlink, few modification in CAN itself are required. Is socketCAN svn the place to do so? Kurt _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
