On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:44:16PM +0000, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robin Holt [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 7:06 PM
> > To: Wolfgang Grandegger
> > Cc: Robin Holt; U Bhaskar-B22300; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; Marc Kleine-
> > Budde
> > Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 03:03:50PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > > On 08/09/2011 02:49 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
...
> > > > How would you like to change that? Should I add it as part of this
> > > > patch, add another patch to the series, or let you take care of it?
> > > >
> > > > Also, I assume the uboot project will need to be changed as well to
> > > > reflect the corrected name.
> > >
> > > I think you should provide patches within this series to cleanup the
> > > obsolete stuff, dts and binding doc.
> >
> > It reads to me that the binding doc now reduces just the required
> > properties. Should I remove the file entirely?
> [Bhaskar] I think the binding doc should atleast be present with the required
> properties to give the clarity
> about the CAN functionality
> can0@1c000 {
> compatible = "fsl,flexcan";
> reg = <0x1c000 0x1000>;
> interrupts = <48 0x2>;
> interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
> clock-frequency = <fixed by u-boot>;
> };
I am not sure what clarity we get for it. Here it is as a work in progress:
CAN Device Tree Bindings
------------------------
2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
fsl,flexcan nodes
-----------------------
Only the required compatible-, reg- and interrupt-properties are supported.
Examples:
can0@1c000 {
compatible = "fsl,flexcan";
reg = <0x1c000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <48 0x2>;
interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
};
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
