On 09/20/2011 05:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 16 September 2011, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> On 09/16/2011 09:19 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:22:45 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger said: >>>> There are 64-bit systems out there, like the ATOM N450, which >>>> have ISA slots. >>> >>> That's a scary thought... >> >> Well. Actually we need it for Intel Atom N450 PC/104-Plus SBCs. > > I would assume that you have a small set of ISA add-on cards that > you actually need to support, right?
Yes, various PC/104 compatible boards can be connected to the ISA bus on such systems (via PC/104 connector). I personally do only care about the CAN devices (as maintainer). > Since most ISA drivers don't actually use isa_register_driver > (for good or bad), how about changing the Kconfig entry for > the ones you need to 'depends on ISA || PLAT_GRANDEGGER_PC104_ATOM' > or similar? What should the PLAT_GRANDEGGER_PC104_ATOM be good for? If I replace isa_register_driver() with platform_driver_register(), like the serial 8250 driver does, HAS_IOMEM should be just fine. This would then also avoid the 64-bit trouble expected with old ISA drivers (enabled via ISA). Or have I missed something? Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
