From: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:06:58 +0200
> Am 12.10.2011 14:59, schrieb Wolfgang Grandegger: >> Hi, >> >> On 10/06/2011 02:13 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:36:08AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>>> On 10/06/2011 11:26 AM, Yegor Yefremov wrote: >>>>>>> 2. 'can-utils' containing the content of the current SVN >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - use the integrated wiki functionality of GitHub for documentation ( >>>>>>> https://github.com/features/projects/wikis) >>>>>> Do we need a separate project to handle the kernel and utilities? >>>>> I'm for separation of the kernel and utilities, so that distro >>>>> maintainers can pick the latest package and include it in their software >>>>> repos. As you say, kernel repo is mainly interesting for backward >>>>> compatibility. can-utils should get version number and man pages. >>>> I was thinking about different repositories under the same project. >>>> >>> Any of both solutions imply a seperation of tools & kernel code. Good! >> OK, let's start with the mailing lists. I think there is consensus to >> move to a list named "linux-can" on "vger.kernel.org". Any objections? >> >> BTW: what is the procedure to get such a mailing list, e.g. whom should >> we contact? Unfortunately, I did not find any useful link on the internet. > > I think David Miller is the right person to contact. At least he is mentioned > here http://www.tux.org/lkml/#contributors. linux-can has been created _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
