On 06/27/2011 03:50 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> Is this modification then also the right thing to do?

yes - there's no need for "default N' (or 'default n') as it's default.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> index 1d699e3..ac48574 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ menu "CAN Device Drivers"
>  config CAN_VCAN
>       tristate "Virtual Local CAN Interface (vcan)"
>       depends on CAN
> -     default N
>       ---help---
>         Similar to the network loopback devices, vcan offers a
>         virtual local CAN interface.
> @@ -15,7 +14,6 @@ config CAN_VCAN
>  config CAN_SLCAN
>       tristate "Serial / USB serial CAN Adaptors (slcan)"
>       depends on CAN
> -     default N
>       ---help---
>         CAN driver for several 'low cost' CAN interfaces that are attached
>         via serial lines or via USB-to-serial adapters using the LAWICEL
> @@ -124,7 +122,6 @@ source "drivers/net/can/softing/Kconfig"
>  config CAN_DEBUG_DEVICES
>       bool "CAN devices debugging messages"
>       depends on CAN
> -     default N
>       ---help---
>         Say Y here if you want the CAN device drivers to produce a bunch of
>         debug messages to the system log.  Select this if you are having

If you make a patch from it...

Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]>

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Socketcan-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-users

Reply via email to