Hi Marc, On 10/13/2011 10:37 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > Hello, > > On 10/13/2011 09:13 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> over night, while I was sleeping, the mailing list moved :-), let's go >> ahead finding a new home for the can-utils, kernel-out-of-tree and maybe >> libsocketcan... > > I think it's a good idea to import the berlios svn subtree containing > the can-utils into the git repo on the new server. The git history looks > better if we convert the svn usernames to a proper author field, e.g.: > "John Developer <[email protected]>".
Yep, as described also in "Importing from SVN" at http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/UsingGit > Urs, Oliver, Wolfgang and all other contributors, what's your preferred > email? Wolfgang Grandegger <[email protected]> >From that description it also seems that we can push only to one git repository per project. This again rises the question how to handle and name the can-utils and can-kmods. I see the following possibilities: 1. *One* project named "socketcan" or "linux-can" for both. In the git repo we could then store all socketcan related code in: can-utils/... The CAN Utils can-lib/... Eventually A Socketcan library, might be integrated into can-utils kernel/... Out-of-tree kernel modules for 2.6 and 3.x kernel-2.4/... Old kernel modules for 2.4 2. *Two* different projects named "can-utils" and "can-kmod". Any preferences? Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-users
