On 10/29/2011 2:26 PM, Nix wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2011, Kyle Brantley uttered the following:
>> Surely you can recreate the bug from the emails though, right? I mean,
>> that sucks don't get me wrong, but technically nothing should be
>> *lost.*
> Bugzilla? Web interface. Not so easy.
>
>> And now that we have a device that can easily reproduce the issue
>> (that doesn't take out your homedir with it!)...
> Indeed!
>
>> If I can help here, let me know how.
> What we really need is an indication of what the heck is turning on
> PCIe ASPM after the e1000e driver turns it on. It's not the e1000
> driver: it's something in the PCI layer, but nobody knows what.
>
> I'm afraid my next approach was going to be 'printk() all over the damn
> place', but that's not a very helpful thing to say to someone else
> really.
>
> Maybe this is an excuse for me to buy a net6501! :)
>

Well the recent Fedora kernels work fine, no tweaks. The CentOS 
kernels... well, every time I rebooted the 6501, I got a different 
number of ethernet devices visible to the OS. Neat stuff.

o someone somewhere fixed it between F12/F13 (which CentOS 6 was based 
on) and F15.

--Kyle
_______________________________________________
Soekris-tech mailing list
Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com
http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech

Reply via email to