2007/11/13, Fabio Margarido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Nov 4, 2007 7:33 PM, Pekka Pessi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In my reading of the spec the section 13.2.2.3 refers to "UAC core" > > layer (in Sofia, NUA) but the second final error response is already > > ACKed at transaction layer described by RFC 3261 section 17 (in Sofia, > > NTA).
> Oh, OK. Would that mean that the part about the second non-2XX > response in the RFC doesn't make sense? I guess it makes sense because the UAC core has to handle late responses to INVITE (which we incidentally do not do, as you might have noticed from nua_i_fork threads). -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
