2008/4/21, Erland Lewin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I sent an e-mail asking about UPnP support, didn't get a reply, so now I'm > looking at implementing it.
Cool. I recall that we had a UPnP implementation, but it was not compatible with LGPL so it was dropped. > My plan is to add two tport_vtable_t, one for udp with upnp and one for upnp > client with upnp. Does that make sense? To start with I'm using the same > function pointers as for regular UDP, but checking in the functions if UPnP > is selected. That sounds reasonable. After you get response from UPnP NAT (and you know the public IP address and port numer) you should update the address in tp_addr (and tp_addrinfo) and call tport_has_been_updated(). -- Pekka.Pessi mail at nokia.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
