Hi all, More than probably, it's my fault, but I am getting tons of memory leaks in my NTA-based application (using sofia-sip v1.12.8). The worst one is reported by valgrind like this:
==31415== 8,795,284 (1,302,928 direct, 7,492,356 indirect) bytes in 2,692 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 20 of 22 ==31415== at 0x4023DE2: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397) ==31415== by 0x40FEA01: su_home_new (su_alloc.c:551) ==31415== by 0x407B35C: msg_create (msg.c:61) ==31415== by 0x40957E1: nta_msg_create_for_transport (nta.c:2790) ==31415== by 0x411558C: tport_msg_alloc (tport.c:2628) ==31415== by 0x4115B59: tport_recv_iovec (tport.c:3075) ==31415== by 0x41224BA: tport_recv_dgram (tport_type_udp.c:308) ==31415== by 0x4119A74: tport_recv_event (tport.c:2821) ==31415== by 0x4119DC7: tport_base_wakeup (tport.c:2760) ==31415== by 0x402CDAC: su_source_dispatch (su_source.c:492) ==31415== by 0x43CD6F7: g_main_context_dispatch (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1800.2) ==31415== by 0x43D0DA2: (within /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1800.2) I am using stateful NTA agent, and I destroy all the incoming transactions with nta_incoming_destroy() and all the call legs with nta_leg_destroy(). Is there something I am missing? I read that nta_incoming_destroy() won't deallocate the resources directly, but mark them as disposable, to be removed in a timeout. What's the frequency of that timeout? Thanks in advance, -Aleksander ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
