Is this still the case with current darcs? I think this issue was already fixed.
Mike On Apr 29, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Linus Surguy wrote: > Hi All, > > We have a b2bua application where session timers are used on the > outbound leg. The session timer functionality is requested by the far > end with a response in the 200 OK. > > "Require: timer > Session-Expires: 900;refresher=uac" > > These session timers appear to run correctly and at first refresh > time, > Sofia generates the INVITE. However, it only appears to add a 'Min-SE' > header to this and not a 'Session-Expires'. > > RFC4028 appears to suggest that it should: > > 7.4. Generating Subsequent Session Refresh Requests > [...]In a session refresh request sent within a dialog with an active > session timer, the Session-Expires header field SHOULD be present. > [...] > > Although confusingly section 7.1 > > 7.1. Generating an Initial Session Refresh Request > [...]A UAC MAY include a Session-Expires header field in an initial > session refresh request if it wants a session timer applied to the > session. [...] > > The reason that this is an issue is that one of the endpoints is > ignoring the INVITE completely and the supplier concerned is > suggesting > that the lack of the Session-Expires is the reason. > > We're using sofia 1.20.10 > > Does anyone have any thoughts? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf _______________________________________________ Sofia-sip-devel mailing list Sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sofia-sip-devel
