JR:

  Your use of the quad mixer with 455 kHz is no doubt something I as well as 
others hope you get a chance to document.  I feel that such a circuit will be 
very popular.  I will go look up the SA612/602 mixers you are planing on using 
in the Ten-Tec RX320D.  Ten Tec makes some good things. 

(SA602 = NTE Device Number: NTE7164 IC-Linear, Double-Balanced Mixer & OSC this 
is what I pulled up out of my NTE software: this idea of a balanced mixer / 
oscillator on a chip interest me.)

  You seem to like the idea of these things as marketable future products and 
perhaps the largest selling group could be the shortwave listeners.  I also 
feel that a simple receiver that can give general coverage will be a good 
seller also.  A good and stable vfo design in that case is the thing to look 
into.  I am looing into both ideas and I hope to compile all I learn into a 
text for not just myself but everyone interested.  I have the time to explore 
the circuits and draw them up.  And I will not charge for the text since people 
such as you and others are giving me ideas for it.

  If you have figured out pretty much the way to match things to most 455 Khz 
ceramic filters then good.  I will look at the 602 version from NTE and see 
whats up there.

  Or in a board design let say.. Perhaps a high impedance preamp and a 
potentiometer will make the device more easily matched to most radios if it is 
viewed as a rf voltage and sampling probe rather than a perfect rf match.  So 
long as the input impedance of the quad detector board is way higher than the 
tap point in the recever circuit it should then work with every 455 kHz radio.  
The potentiometer is merely a load which is very high (50 to 100 kohms) and in 
parallel to a lower impedance in the receiver i.f. chain.  The potentiometer 
merely doesn't seem to be there load wise to the receiver; but the preamp 
obtains a signal according to the level the pot is set at.  A short length of 
cable can go from the tap point to the quad board of perhaps 1 to 2 feet at 
most if the board is in a box outside of the receiver.  And maybe a 500 to 1000 
ohm resistor is between the tap point and cable to offset and isolate the cable 
from loading the tap point.  I think you could figure out what I mean and maybe 
use it sometime, but a preamp seems called for in this sort of an idea as an rf 
voltage sampling amplifier. I will draw up a diagram here soon of what I mean.

  After having looked at the phase shift coil that Rick Campbell used, it 
appears to me that if the same coil was used to split off a 455 kHz signal with 
a mixer and crystal offset about 98 kHz from 455 kHz perhaps an even simpler 
circuit can be made for 455 kHz.  I will have to draw up a circuit diagram to 
better explain it but the logic of it came to me yesterday and so I will 
explore it.  Folk could look at it and then decide if it seems like something 
to try.  (Maybe a very simple device; if I continue to look at it.)
 
  I will try to keep and sort through my notes and once I have the story down 
fairly well I will write it all up in a text with diagrams.  Wolfgang is 
explaining to me the importance of phase noise being reduced especially in the 
case of using DRM software.  He is telling me that the reduction methods in the 
circuits will not come cheaply.  I will have to review the handbooks and text 
to re-read up on oscillator phase noise and jitter.  I have math and formulas 
from the manufacturers of single package type block oscillators that define the 
paramaters of jitter and noise.

  I understand oscillator design and how to calculate the capaciitive load of 
the oscillator circuit on the crystal so I am good there.  I should also 
include in my notes the ideas of crystal and vfo circuit designs so the load is 
understood.

  I think I am now getting the picture of the whole idea of whats required 
depending on the type of SDR software and so the receivers and i.f. boards 
should be compatible as much as possible with all SDR software and even DRM.

  I do have some digital circuits that I have found but I am looking at the 
basic ideas first of all using as much analog ideas as I can to begin with; in 
the rf sections of the SDR receiver scheme.  Rick Campbell's little circuit 
showed me an analog way to do this, and that surprised me in that it was 
defining pure radio and audio signals as we know them to be without mysterious 
TTL type clock or divider circuits to have to study up on.

Dan

  


_____________________________________________________________________
Call Anyone, Anytime, Anywhere in the World - FREE!
Free Internet calling from NetZero Voice
Visit http://www.netzerovoice.com today!







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to