ISB could also be used to operate a two way communication channel 
similar to working split frequency.

Simple protocols would need to be established dealing with which 
sideband is used to initiate a communication.

I would imagine these sorts of things would be simple to execute in 
software.



Leif Asbrink wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
>   
>> I had never given too much thought to that idea before, but two I/Q ISB 
>> signals should be used to be translated to the working frequency, using 
>> the same two carriers in quadrature on the PC. That allows to use 
>> existent hardware, and I believe it is advisable to use I-Q signals to 
>> be able to take adventage of image rejection mixers as many designs I 
>> have seen (Softrock, YU1LM, etc) do to keep spurious outputs low.
>>     
> It is much simpler. We want two independent SSB signals at the antenna.
> One LSB and another USB. They should be independent so the (suppressed)
> carrier does not have to be the same. Both carriers just have to be
> separated by less than the tuning accuracy needed at the receive side.
> It is perfectly fine to use two conventional SSB transmitters with
> separate antennas. On the RX side you would simply have the summed
> electromagnetic field from the two transmitters.
>
>   
>

Reply via email to