No, it's the other way around.
On Saturday, 14 April 2012, Peter Agg wrote:
> <pendent>
> Isn't forwards compatibility what we're after in this case?
>
> Backwards compatibility = being able to open older whatevers in the latest
> Forwards compatibility = being able to open latest whatevers in an older
> </pendent>
>
>
>
> On 14 April 2012 15:37, Ed Schiffer <edschif...@gmail.com<javascript:_e({},
> 'cvml', 'edschif...@gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> I really thought Softimage had backwards compatibility before going
>> Autodesk...
>
>
>
--
Chris Marshall
Mint Motion Limited
029 2002 5762
07730 533 115
www.mintmotion.co.uk
