I thought for a second that you were shitting me there Stephen. Can we
agree some things need housecleaning here? And please more elaborate
documentation - there are a lot of plug this into this, but not much why
and how.

Morten






Den 10. maj 2012 kl. 16:35 skrev Stephen Blair
<stephen.bl...@autodesk.com>:

> Or use the “Get Weightmap Value” compound. (NOT the “Get Weight Map
Value” compound ;-)
>
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Blair
> Sent: May-10-12 9:15 AM
> To: Morten Bartholdy; softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: RE: ICE context problems
>
> Plug the location into the Source of a Get Data, then Explore and find
the weights
>
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Morten
Bartholdy
> Sent: May-10-12 9:10 AM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Re: ICE context problems
>
>
> But how do I get weightmap data from the emit location?
>
>
>
> MB
>
> Den 10. maj 2012 kl. 14:54 skrev Philip Melancon
<philip.melan...@modusfx.com>:
> Can't try this right now, but I imagine doing a get data on emit location
would probably do the trick
>
>
>
>       Philip Melancon
>
>       Lead Crowd TD
>
>       Modus FX
>
>
>
> On 5/10/2012 8:51 AM, Morten Bartholdy wrote:
>
> I keep running into annoying context problems in ICE, usually when
wanting to use weightmap data from the emitter geo to drive a scalar value
in a pointcloud.
>
>
>
> An example would be generating strands from a grid and wanting to modify
the length of the strands with a weightmap from the emitter grid. This will
give me a context mismatch: Input context supported: Per object or point of
"name".pointcloud
>
> Output context supported: Per point of grid.polymesh
>
>
>
> How can I get around that one?
>
>
>
> Morten
>
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2425/4987 - Release Date: 05/09/12
>
>

Reply via email to