That's *exactly *why I hate them. Wayyyy too many flavors and options for
people to f**k up. Yes they support a lot of features... but I almost never
want any of them, and I don't want texture guys saving them with layers
using lzw compression in cmyk ;)

Seriously. They suck :P


On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Steven Caron <car...@gmail.com> wrote:

> tifs are perfectly fine... they support many bit depths, mip mapping, and
> tiling. i did a comparison to exr as a texture format years ago and
> OIIO/Arnold liked the tif files better.
>
> s
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Simon van de Lagemaat <
> si...@theembassyvfx.com> wrote:
>
>> What do people here use as a standard format?  I always thought tiff
>> was the least offensive format but after running into some issues with
>> the byte order bs we're wondering if png's might be better?
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Gene Crucean
>> <emailgeneonthel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > .tif's =  the devil
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ... that is all
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Gene Crucean - Emmy winning - Oscar nominated VFX Supervisor / iOS-OSX
>> > Developer / Filmmaker / Photographer
>> > ** Freelance for hire **
>> > www.genecrucean.com
>> >
>> > ~~ Please use my website's contact form on www.genecrucean.com for any
>> > personal emails. Thanks. I may not get them at this address. ~~
>> >
>>
>
>


-- 
Gene Crucean - Emmy winning - Oscar nominated VFX Supervisor / iOS-OSX
Developer / Filmmaker / Photographer
** *Freelance for hire* **
www.genecrucean.com

~~ Please use my website's contact form on www.genecrucean.com for any
personal emails. Thanks. I may not get them at this address. ~~

Reply via email to