That's *exactly *why I hate them. Wayyyy too many flavors and options for people to f**k up. Yes they support a lot of features... but I almost never want any of them, and I don't want texture guys saving them with layers using lzw compression in cmyk ;)
Seriously. They suck :P On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Steven Caron <car...@gmail.com> wrote: > tifs are perfectly fine... they support many bit depths, mip mapping, and > tiling. i did a comparison to exr as a texture format years ago and > OIIO/Arnold liked the tif files better. > > s > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Simon van de Lagemaat < > si...@theembassyvfx.com> wrote: > >> What do people here use as a standard format? I always thought tiff >> was the least offensive format but after running into some issues with >> the byte order bs we're wondering if png's might be better? >> >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Gene Crucean >> <emailgeneonthel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > .tif's = the devil >> > >> > >> > >> > ... that is all >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Gene Crucean - Emmy winning - Oscar nominated VFX Supervisor / iOS-OSX >> > Developer / Filmmaker / Photographer >> > ** Freelance for hire ** >> > www.genecrucean.com >> > >> > ~~ Please use my website's contact form on www.genecrucean.com for any >> > personal emails. Thanks. I may not get them at this address. ~~ >> > >> > > -- Gene Crucean - Emmy winning - Oscar nominated VFX Supervisor / iOS-OSX Developer / Filmmaker / Photographer ** *Freelance for hire* ** www.genecrucean.com ~~ Please use my website's contact form on www.genecrucean.com for any personal emails. Thanks. I may not get them at this address. ~~