Bigger mountains have moved my friend.

Jordi Bares
jordiba...@gmail.com

On 8 Mar 2014, at 19:01, Mario Reitbauer <cont...@marioreitbauer.at> wrote:

> I signed the petition but still we (you) guys should maybe start thinking 
> about stopping the daydreaming.
> AD made a decision and this decision is a final one.
> 
> The only thing which could happen is:
> Okey guys we will continue to have Softimage in our product portfolio without 
> developing for it.
> Is that what everyone wants ??
> Staying with a software which isnt further developed ? In that case we can 
> simply keep our old versions no problem.
> 
> If you want anything else, you will not suceed anyways. It will end up 
> working on a dead software, whatever we do.
> It is too late. Companies who are working with softimage will migrate to 
> other software. Even if autodesk changes it's mind.
> So no more SI jobs will lead to the need to migrate to a new Software anyways.
> 
> Just my 2 cent.
> And don't think I am not sad about what happend.
> 
> 
> 2014-03-08 19:30 GMT+01:00 Nick Martinelli <n...@nickmartinelli.net>:
>      I apologize for labeling this as URGENT, I really feel that this should 
> be read by all regardless of side.
> 
> 
>      The outcry from the community is staggering both on here and the 
> petition (3520 in only a couple days!).  I seriously doubt that AD's reps 
> were prepared for such a backlash.  They are being bombarded with emails 
> right now, some full of warranted CG rage and others making valid points. Due 
> to this, it's very easy for them to get overlooked.  I'm not defending them, 
> but I know that if I was in their shoes I wouldn't want to sift through a 
> bunch of emails putting me down.  This isn't to say that those thoughts 
> aren't warranted, I know I'm fighting back some rage words as I'm typing 
> this.  If we want answers, we unfortunately need to be diplomatic.
> 
>      This thread is intended to group all of our questions together in a way 
> that they can't go unnoticed.  I have seen some fantastic inquiries that 
> haven't been addressed.  So please word your questions concisely and clearly 
> here, also do your best to refrain from any insults or harsh language.  Lets 
> organize everything in a polite and strategic way, if they still go 
> unanswered then they really aren't "listening".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Nick Martinelli
> (201) 424 - 6518
> www.nickMartinelli.net
> n...@nickmartinelli.net
> 

Reply via email to