Raff, You are referring to poly modeling I take it? How is its NURBS modeling today?
-- Joey Ponthieux LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES) Mymic Technical Services NASA Langley Research Center __________________________________________________ Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not represent the opinions of NASA or any other party. From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Raffaele Fragapane Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 8:37 PM To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com Subject: Re: SI and Houdini Modelling in Houdini is OK for some unique things, but don't even try it as a replacement for more "traditional" techniques and tasks, it's only moderately more advanced than manually punching in vertices and edges by indices in a text file. It's OK for meshing tasks and other similar things, heavily influenced by the needs of an FX-y platform to do those, just not the "artistic" kind of platform to do it creatively or quickly. On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:55 AM, David Saber <davidsa...@sfr.fr<mailto:davidsa...@sfr.fr>> wrote: Thanks Jordi for your commitment . These PDF were a very interesting read. Houdini looks nice. But I have to say the modelling seems a bit like an alien land... I'll have to try Houdini to better make up my mind . David On 2014-03-10 18:35, Jordi Bares wrote: My suggestion is to do the homework by looking at the SI Users forum, read the guides I am writing and download the apprentice version. Put a bit of time and patience, it will take a bit to sink in but if you are certain type of high quality work surely is the package to consider. -- Our users will know fear and cower before our software! Ship it! Ship it and let them flee like the dogs they are!
