Pretty much only RS here too. Shading limitations and lack of sdk can be
annoying but the rendertimes make up for it ;-)

-Fabian

On 5 January 2016 at 14:12, Juan Brockhaus <[email protected]> wrote:

> got one license and using it on the current project.
> it's great.
>
> Juan
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Rob Chapman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 3 here
>> On 5 Jan 2016 12:55, "adrian wyer" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> we got a couple, will buy more soon..... love it
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> a
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mirko Jankovic
>>> *Sent:* 05 January 2016 12:47
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: Redshift users?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> got 4 licences and never regret getting a single one of those.
>>>
>>> Redshift all the way :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Miquel Campos <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have one license. But I am not using it too much. At less for the
>>> moment :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Miquel Campos
>>>
>>> www.miquel-campos.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Olivier Jeannel <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> All I do goes through RS :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Angus Davidson <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Started using it , but when we switched to Macs in the labs, redshift as
>>> yet doesn’t have a mac version (on is supposedly in dev).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Moved to Octane and since then haven’t looked back.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Angus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Morten Bartholdy [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> *Sent:* 05 January 2016 02:32 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Redshift users?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Out of curiosity - how many of you have started using or completely
>>> switched to Redshift?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Morten
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is
>>> confidential. If you have received this communication in error, please
>>> notify us immediately and destroy the original message. You may not copy or
>>> disseminate this communication without the permission of the University.
>>> Only authorised signatories are competent to enter into agreements on
>>> behalf of the University and recipients are thus advised that the content
>>> of this message may not be legally binding on the University and may
>>> contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which are not
>>> necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the Witwatersrand,
>>> Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and outsiders are
>>> subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in writing to the
>>> contrary.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to