Hi,

Thanks for that mail Tristan.

Le 07/07/2016 à 16:47, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit :
> Greeting folks,
> 
> I'd like to schedule a backlog grooming next Monday after the daily
> standup. Please reply to this thread with the story you'd like to be
> implemented for the next sprint.
> 
> Here is my list:
> 
> * Release of 2.2.3 and upgrade of sf-project.io[0]
> -> The goal is to get systemd daemon-reload fixes, as well as
> -> Deploy storyboard (tech preview) to start playing with it

Here are some previously discussed stories we should re-discuss or (because 
already groomed)
plan for the next sprint :
- The so famous "login page" refactoring 
http://softwarefactory-project.io/redmine/issues/1437
- Schedule of the SF/RDO followup meeting 
http://softwarefactory-project.io/redmine/issues/1479
- Add smtp notifications for POST config job 
http://softwarefactory-project.io/redmine/issues/1432
- Clean admin_mail_forward notifications 
http://softwarefactory-project.io/redmine/issues/1445


> I'd like to reduce the scope of this story to sf-project.io only.
> 
> 
> * Integrate ELK to index CI logs[1]
> -> At the end of current sprint, we'll have the backend in place
>    and before moving on to adding a front-end, I'd like we focus on
>    implementing integration tests
> -> Moreover i'd like us to be able to query elastic search database
>    directly. It seems very important that we are able to understand
>    and operate that first (critical) stack.
> 
> 
> Probably not for next sprint, I'd like to present/discuss an improvement
> to our LXC usage... How about we switch to runc ?
> Based on my previous experiment[2] it seems like a fine container
> technology that plays nicely with systemd.
> 
> I've demonstrated how it can be used to test zuul[3] and indeed in 2
> minutes it's able to build, configure, start and test zuul-server, 2
> zuul-merger and a bunch of zuul-launcher.
> 
> Basically, here is the (early) proposed plan:
> * Adds a new deploy/runc/deploy.py script to replace in-place LXC.
> * Adapt the current ansible configuration tooling to support out of
>   the instance usage (to be run from directly from the host).
> * Dissociate service data from the rootfs, so that backup, migration
>   and upgrade are less critical.
> 
> The goal is to avoid problem we encounter frequently when doing upgrade.
> Note that much like the dyn-arch effort, this could be implemented in
> parallel without breaking the current workflow.
> 
> Regards,
> -Tristan
> 
> [0] http://softwarefactory-project.io/redmine/issues/1480
> [1] http://softwarefactory-project.io/redmine/issues/1442
> [2] http://softwarefactory-project.io/r/gitweb?p=sf-runc.git;a=summary
> [3]
> http://softwarefactory-project.io/jenkins/job/sf-runc-functional-tests/11/console
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Softwarefactory-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
Softwarefactory-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev

Reply via email to