----- Original Message ----- > Hi,
> On 17/01/18 10:49 AM, Fabien Boucher wrote: > > Hi, > > > Looking at the last SF job to write for zuul3 "sf-deploy-lastest" make me > > feel this one will need to be updated to use only a bare centos image and > > not the sf image master as of today. Indeed I think we are all align about > > to no longer build and provide an image for SF. > > > Furthermore with "sf-deploy-latest" we use the heat templates to manage the > > deployment. Should we continue to provide heat templates ? It's hard to > > maintain and can be replace by an Ansible playbook[1] (w/o os_stack) based > > on an arch.yaml file. Or even we can decide to skip completely > > > any deployment tool. wdyt ? > > I think we should replace the heat template with an ansible playbook. It's > could be really useful to easily test all the arch files provide in > sf-config. We can add some tasks to do the deployment based on arch file in > the existing playbook [1] Hi, Yes, I think an Ansible playbook will be easier to maintain (and test). Cheers, Javier > Nico > [1] https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/#/c/10737/ > > Finally, so I don't migrate that job as it will require more refactoring. > > It > > will be adpated to zuul3 later. > > > [1] > > https://tree.taiga.io/project/morucci-software-factory/us/515?no-milestone=1 > > > Cheers, > > > Fabien > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Softwarefactory-dev mailing list [email protected] > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Softwarefactory-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev
_______________________________________________ Softwarefactory-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev
