On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 11:20, RUIZ LOPEZ Noel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> First of all, thanks for your quick answer.
>
> I have tried to upgrade from 3.0 to 3.2, but I get this error when I try to 
> install the 3.2
> "Error: centos-release-ceph-luminous conflicts with 
> centos-release-ceph-jewel-1.0-1.el7.centos.noarch"

I removed centos-release-ceph before installing
https://softwarefactory-project.io/repos/sf-release-3.2.rpm to fix
that dependency issue.

> I see that I can fix it adding --skip-broken but.... I am not pretty sure If 
> this is a good idea...I will wait for your opinión. In my first approach I 
> tried to deploy directly sf 3.2 but with our arch I get some errors and at 
> the end I give up. Anyway I can try again.

I would highly recommend figuring out the arch for sf-3.2 before
attempting the upgrade! Which component did you have trouble with in
your arch?

> By other hand, I remount /srv/host-rootfs to try but, this doesn't works.
>
>
> I attach our arch.yaml in case it could help
>
> ________________________________________
> De: Tristan Cacqueray [[email protected]]
> Enviado: viernes, 12 de abril de 2019 2:55
> Para: Javier Pena; RUIZ LOPEZ Noel; [email protected]
> Asunto: Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Zuul NODE FAILURE
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 12:08 Javier Pena wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >> Hello,
> >
> >> I have just deployed software factory and when I tried to test how zuul
> >> works, I got the following zuul error:
> >
> >> NODE_FAILURE
> >
> >> Now, I can see that nodes always keep "building" state.
> >
> >> nodepool log :
> >
> >> 2019-04-11 17:55:18,203 ERROR nodepool.NodeLauncher-0000000046: Launch
> >> attempt 9/9 failed for node 0000000046:
> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >> File
> >> "/opt/rh/rh-python35/root/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/nodepool/driver/oci/handler.py",
> >> line 40, in launch
> >> self.handler.pool, hostid, port, self.label)
> >> File
> >> "/opt/rh/rh-python35/root/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/nodepool/driver/oci/provider.py",
> >> line 149, in createContainer
> >> "Manager %s failed to initialized" % self.provider.name)
> >> RuntimeError: Manager oci-provider-hypervisor-oci failed to initialized
> >> 2019-04-11 17:55:19,208 ERROR nodepool.NodeLauncher-0000000046: Launch 
> >> failed
> >> for node 0000000046:
> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >> File
> >> "/opt/rh/rh-python35/root/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/nodepool/driver/__init__.py",
> >> line 659, in run
> >> self.launch()
> >> File
> >> "/opt/rh/rh-python35/root/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/nodepool/driver/oci/handler.py",
> >> line 57, in launch
> >> self.node.host_keys = key
> >> UnboundLocalError: local variable 'key' referenced before assignment
> >> 2019-04-11 17:55:19,208 ERROR nodepool.NodeLauncher-0000000045: Launch 
> >> failed
> >> for node 0000000045:
> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >> File
> >> "/opt/rh/rh-python35/root/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/nodepool/driver/__init__.py",
> >> line 659, in run
> >> self.launch()
> >> File
> >> "/opt/rh/rh-python35/root/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/nodepool/driver/oci/handler.py",
> >> line 57, in launch
> >> self.node.host_keys = key
> >> UnboundLocalError: local variable 'key' referenced before assignment
> >> 2019-04-11 17:55:22,918 INFO nodepool.DeletedNodeWorker: Deleting failed
> >> instance 0000000045-centos-oci-100-0000000045 from
> >> oci-provider-hypervisor-oci
> >> 2019-04-11 17:55:22,926 INFO nodepool.NodeDeleter: Deleting ZK node
> >> id=0000000045, state=deleting,
> >> external_id=0000000045-centos-oci-100-0000000045
> >> 2019-04-11 17:55:22,934 INFO nodepool.DeletedNodeWorker: Deleting failed
> >> instance 0000000046-centos-oci-100-0000000046 from
> >> oci-provider-hypervisor-oci
> >> 2019-04-11 17:55:22,940 INFO nodepool.NodeDeleter: Deleting ZK node
> >> id=0000000046, state=deleting,
> >> external_id=0000000046-centos-oci-100-0000000046
> >> 2019-04-11 17:55:26,276 INFO nodepool.NodePool: Creating requests for 2
> >> centos-oci nodes
> >> 2019-04-11 17:55:29,822 INFO
> >> nodepool.PoolWorker.oci-provider-hypervisor-oci-main: Assigning node 
> >> request
> >> <NodeRequest {'id': '100-0000000047', 'node_types': ['centos-oci'], 
> >> 'state':
> >> 'requested', 'state_time': 1554998126.2781763, 'stat':
> >> ZnodeStat(czxid=11466, mzxid=11466, ctime=1554998126279,
> >> mtime=1554998126279, version=0, cversion=0, aversion=0, ephemeralOwner=0,
> >> dataLength=217, numChildren=0, pzxid=11466), 'nodes': [], 'reuse': False,
> >> 'declined_by': [], 'requestor': 'NodePool:min-ready'}>
> >> 2019-04-11 17:55:29,845 WARNING nodepool.driver.oci.OpenContainerProvider:
> >> Creating container when provider isn't ready
> >
> >> Any idea?
>
> Hello Noel,
>
> NODE_ERROR indicates a failure to start the nodes, and the exception you
> found in the logs is an issue that has been fixed in newer version.
> It seems like you deployed Software Factory version 3.0, since 3.1 the
> drivers has been renamed runC and greatly improved.
> Can you try to upgrade to version 3.2:
>
> https://www.softwarefactory-project.io/docs/3.2/operator/upgrade.html
>
> After the upgrade process, please restart the instance (that's because
> we don't support upgrade from 3.0, and restart is needed to refresh the
> services).
>
>
> >
> > Hi Noel,
> >
> > I'm not sure if it's the same situation, but last time I tried to use oci 
> > containers I had to remount /srv/host-rootfs as read-write before it would 
> > work the first time (it is mounted as read-only by default). After this and 
> > a reboot, it worked fine as ro.
> >
> > So can you try a quick "mount -o remount,rw /srv/host-rootfs" and see if it 
> > fixes it?
> >
>
> Since version 3.1 (and the rename to runC), we fixed a critical issue
> with bubblewrap and this remount shouldn't be needed anymore.
>
> Regards,
> -Tristan_______________________________________________
> Softwarefactory-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev

_______________________________________________
Softwarefactory-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev

Reply via email to