Hi, I have a quick review on this draft, and want to make sure I am clear about the technical things in the first place.
1. I am confused why tunnel identifier is lacked in the example translation table showcased in figure 2, as my understanding, CID and tunnel ID should be combined to be used to lookup against the translation table. Am I missing something? 2. To my understanding, CIDs differentiate different AD for a gateway and tunnel IDs differentiate different gateways for a AFTR, so combination of CID and tunnel ID can be used to idenfity an AD for AFTR. Shouldn't CID-1/2 be TID-1/2 in the figure 1? Thanks, washam _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
