-----Message d'origine----- De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Ahmad Muhanna Envoyé : mercredi 12 mai 2010 08:16 À : Sri Gundavelli Cc : [email protected] Objet : Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Hello Sri, I understand what you are saying. However, I have sincere doubts on this approach being overlayed on top of current IETF mobility protocols without any impact nor interactions, in specific MIP6/PMIP6 suite of protocols. If the draft is trying to offer a solution for networks that deploy mobility architecture (IETF mobility architecture), I strongly believe that we are obligated to understand how this works and solves the issue if there is one before we adopt the draft. I may be missing something here, but from IETF prospective, I strongly believe that the mobility groups need to look into the claim that this proposal can be overlayed on top of IETF mobility protocols without any negative impact or interaction. On the other hand, for example, if PMIP6 is deployed in a network with the assumptions and pre-conditions that GI DS-Lite highlighted and assumed, do we need this proposal? These questions need answers! Otherwise, we are not putting the cart in front of the horse, we are putting a train:-) Med: +1. ********************************* This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration. France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender. ******************************** _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
